We only work with brands spending $40k+/mo on Meta ads.
← All case studiesShark & Ninja
Consumer appliances

Shark & Ninja: 45,000 assets, 200+ creators, every month for eighteen months

45,000
raw video assets and finished ads

Ads we made for Shark & Ninja

At a glance

Assets produced
45,000 (raw video and finished ads)
Creators
200+
Cadence
every month for eighteen months
Formats
performance, podcast, reaction, UGC and skits

The engagement

Timeframe:
Every month for the last eighteen months
Creative volume:
200+ creators held to one standard across every format they run

Results

45,000
raw video assets and finished ads made for them
200+
creators, held to one standard
18
consecutive months, renewed every one

What we did

  • A production line rather than a project: 200+ creators cast, briefed and edited to one consistent standard.
  • Every format their buyers run, from performance and UGC through to podcast, reaction and skits.
  • Volume that holds its standard is the hard part. Anyone can make 45,000 assets badly.

What we do not publish

We are not cleared to publish Shark or Ninja's performance numbers. What we can say is that they have re-bought every month for eighteen months, which is the only number a brand that size votes with.

Questions

How many ads has Exposure made for Shark and Ninja?

45,000 assets, which includes raw video assets as well as finished ads. It is not 45,000 finished ads. The work spans 200+ creators and every format their buyers run.

Why does this case study have no performance numbers?

Because we are not cleared to publish them. Large brands rarely grant written permission to publish account data. The verifiable signal we can offer is tenure: they have re-bought every month for eighteen months.

More case studies